Blah Blah Blah, I am talking, and stuff that I care about. Blah Blah Blah
Monday, October 22, 2007
Crap that just ain't right!
I guess the judges in Oregon have lost any level of logic. They have let the sue happy crowd get away with it again, this time blaming the previous owner of a vehicle for not properly maintaining his truck he sold a year before hand. Of course the current owner had an accident because of a axle failure and, well, he can't take responsibility for it, he has to blame someone else. So lets blame the last guy, for not maintaining his truck that had over 500,000 miles on it.
Is it really that amazing that a letter intended to silence Rush Limbaugh (which was a failure) would go for so much money when put up for charity by Rush himself. Well to me it isn't. I'd be surprised if it didn't. Rush has a powerful influence, and active listeners who believe what this man says. Manly because it's true. Truth is light in this dark world, and Rush doesn't let anyone cover up his light.
Then to try to top Rush, Harry Reid tries to take credit, TAKE CREDIT, for this letter. He intended it for harm, and Rush used it for good, and like the sleazy dirty rat he is, he tries to get apiece of the attention, as if he was apart of the good, by acting like he's a part of the whole thing. If Harry Reid wanted to impress me, or millions of others across America, all he had to do was match that $2,100,100, and Rush would have sang him praises. Unlike you giving Rush the credit he deserves in this, Rush would have let millions know your sacrifice. He's been calling for it all week, and thus far you have done nothing.
Match that donation Senator, or get all your other 40 Democrats that signed that letter together and put together the 2 Million. Show us you really do care. That would impress me. That would change my mind about you. That would actually let me know you are not the sleaze I believe you are.
I am daily amazed at how so many people are easy swayed by powerful influence to hate those that they see as a threat to their views or politics. I'm not sure why at this point in my life that I am still surprised, but here it is again now with this issue of Rush Limbaugh uttering the words "the phony soldiers".
Now more came after this, but of course this person decided not to included that part. But that is ok we have more clips to come. This next clip is rush responding the next day when the left was trashing him for his phony soldier statement
What is the inherit problem, well Rush did say it was the whole transcript, however he did edit out about 95 seconds of audio. Wait, uh, why did he do that? Was he covering his own rear, yes he must have said something else that was incriminating, there must be so much bad stuff in the 95 secs he couldn't let anyone here it again. Right? Well one lefty thinks so and posted this video.
Well thanks for posting the extra 95 seconds, but, uh, what was so incriminating there? What did he do except basically ignore Mike's comments on WMDs? After letting Mike go, he talked about Jesse MacBeth, conveniently edited out of the last video, but you heard it on the second one. Jesse was the phony soldiers he was specifically speaking of. BUT WAIT THERES MORE. Rush said SOLDIER"S", with an "S", plural. So obviously he meant any and all soldiers that disagree with the war. Well of course. Cause that is what they want you to think. So they take on whatever belief they want to his comments and presto. The smear has begun.
The thing that cracks me up the most is: If that is what Rush really believes, that he thinks any and all military that disagree with the war is a phony solider, than why is that not a common theme with him? Did anyone ask him if that is what he really believes? Does anyone else have any audio proving these are common statements form Rush? Wouldn't you think you need more than a single statement that is easily shown to be taken out of context? Why not follow through with this statement? Rush makes some outlandish comments, and he backs them up. He never hides from them. Yet he specifically never continues with the idea that all soldiers that disagree with the war are phony. Because that is not what he was saying. Plain and simple.
Those that continue to believe that Rush was calling all anti-war soldiers phony are sheep. They believe whatever the left feeds them. They put their trust in the left hacks, and do not think for themselves. I have no doubt that the left can have fine arguments that can be of real substance. This one is not it. Frankly, it is embarrassing. I would be ashamed to be a part of the left with this kind of sorry story taking place and trying to make this phony argument for them.
At the link above we see the left attacking Fred Thompson for not knowing a fact most of us probably wouldn't know. But of course the best part is, it's not true. Fred Thompson said nothing of the sort, as a matter of fact he has said and been quoted on the very fact they said he didn't know. How do you write a whole article trying to make someone looking stupid without checking to make sure it actually happened? Simple, you don't you just lie, and the sheep will absorb it.
